I think main problem is to be able to retest _everything_ with distributed MR and 1.0 by release time. While we can get local tests running probably, hadoop implementation of local mode vs. distributed mode is vastly different, and run and revalidate results in fully distributed mode for everything by release time is probably going to be hard to ensure.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Josh Patterson wrote: > >> I agree with Ted here, 1.0 is more of a marketing thing than anything >> imho. not a huge technical change. > > That's why I thought we might want it in 0.6. Mahout 0.6, built on Hadoop > 1.0 sounds better than Mahout 0.6 built on Hadoop 0.20.2903.57.19.10 or > whatever it was ;-) > > But yeah, I'm fine with the approach outlined. > > -G > >> >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: >>> D has a good idea. >>> >>> 1.0 should be very nearly identical to what we have now so this isn't a big >>> change, but it would be very nice to provide just a bit of consistency >>> nevertheless. >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> No, haven't tried yet. >>>> >>>> i would release it with current dependencies and switch trunk to 1.0. >>>> This way we will have time to work out new kinks, and people who want >>>> previous release would use 0.6 and people who would like to try 1.0 >>>> can use trunk. >>>> >>>> -d >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Should we be switching over to 1.0 for this release or wait? Has anyone >>>> tried it out? >>>>> >>>>> -Grant >>>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Twitter: @jpatanooga >> Solution Architect @ Cloudera >> hadoop: http://www.cloudera.com > > -------------------------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > >
