OK, I made sure /www/mahout.apache.org is from SVN: $ svn info Path: . URL: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mahout/site/new_website
So, to update the site, you update new_website in SVN. I think we're done with this step at least. On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2012, at 4:55 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: > >> On 9 February 2012 13:34, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >>> I just migrated Lucene (I think y'all will find the look and feel quite >>> familiar) over to the new CMS, so I can help if needed. It is quite nice >>> and easy to use. For us, it should be trivial for the main page. The >>> Confluence stuff we really need to fix. >> >> It sounds like the 'Nov 2011' switchoff deadline (for >> confluence-driven sites) reported in >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-804 has stretched to 'end >> of 2012'. >> >> I made a new Confluence page last week and it seems to have >> auto-exported OK - >> https://cwiki.apache.org/MAHOUT/rowsimilarityjob.html - and therefore >> shows up in search engines etc. Having tried the CMS, ... how much of >> the Wiki do you think could live there? Is CMS still going to be >> committer-only, or is any broader participation possible now? > > We're having this exact discussion over in Lucene land. To me, as Mahout > matures, we likely will promote up official docs, so those are good > candidates for the CMS. > > Unfortunately, CMS is committers only. However, having said that, there is > no reason why we can't make people who work on docs committers with the > understanding that it is their primary focus. Some of the bigger projects > explicitly do that. It's not an enforced thing, as in locking them down to > that part of the code only, but more of a recognition of this is the primary > place to make contributions for a particular person based on their past > experience. > > >> Is >> migrating from confluence to http://wiki.apache.org/general/ a >> plausible option? > > I don't really like MoinMoin. I would rather not. >