[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13419914#comment-13419914
 ] 

Jeff Eastman commented on MAHOUT-1045:
--------------------------------------

I thought there was a problem there too (and I spent a bunch of time debugging 
it) but consider: Their definition of inter-cluster density is the average 
density of representative points within one standard deviation of a midpoint 
half way between the closest representative points of each cluster. All of 
those seem to be 0 in this dataset. It might be that sampling more 
representative points would change that but I'm not sure at all.

I will be interested in what you find with some other cluster collections.
                
> Cluster evaluators returning bad results
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-1045
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1045
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Clustering
>    Affects Versions: 0.6, 0.7, 0.8
>         Environment: Several environments and data sets
>            Reporter: Pat Ferrel
>             Fix For: 0.8
>
>         Attachments: MAHOUT-1045.patch, MAHOUT-1045.patch, MAHOUT-1045.patch, 
> MAHOUT-1045.patch, first-time-density-nan.txt
>
>
> With real world crawl data the Intra-cluster density from ClusterEvaluator is 
> almost always NaN. The CDbw inter-cluster density is almost always 0. I have 
> also seen several cases where CDbw fails to return any results but have not 
> tracked down why yet.
> I have sent a link to an 8G data set that reproduces these errors to Jeff 
> Eastman.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to