On Jul 14, 2013, at 7:27 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> I'd say go for it.  Of course, my preference would be that time spent on
>> Mahout right now is focused on testing 0.8, but you are free to do as you
>> wish.
>> 
> 
> it looks good on my part. I found however that a bug was (re-?) introduced
> into UpperTriangular matrix( breaks row count property in certain form of
> constructor) which however did not seem to affect any of existing solvers.
> this is fixed as a part of M-1281

Do we need to respin?


Reply via email to