> On Nov 29, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Sebastian Schelter <ssc.o...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> On 29.11.2013 17:59, Suneel Marthi wrote: >> Open JIRAs for 0.9: >> >> Mahout-1245, Mahout-1304, Mahout-1305, Mahout-1307, Mahout-1326 - related to >> Wiki updates. >> Definitely appreciate more hands here to review/update the wiki >> >> M-1286 - Peng and >> Sebastian, no updates on this. Can this be included in 0.9? > > I will look into this over the weekend! > >> >> M-1030 - Andrew Musselman
I'll have a patch for review this weekend, made progress yesterday. >> >> M-1319, M-1328 - Suneel >> >> M-1347 - Suneel, patch has been committed to trunk. >> >> M-1265 - I have been working with Yexi on this. Ted, would u have time to >> review this; the code's on Reviewboard. >> >> M-1288 - Sole Recommender, Pat Ferrel >> >> M-1345: Isabel, Frank. I think we are good on this patch. Isabel, could u >> commit this to trunk? >> >> M-1312: Stevo, could u look at this? >> >> M-1349: Any takers for this?? >> >> Others: Spectral Kmeans clustering documentation (Shannon) >> >> >> >> >> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 10:38 AM, Suneel Marthi >> <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> Adding Mahout-1349 to the list of JIRAs . >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 10:37 AM, Suneel Marthi >> <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> Update on Open JIRAs for 0.9: >> >> Mahout-1245, Mahout-1304, Mahout-1305, Mahout-1307, Mahout-1326 - all >> related to Wiki updates, please see Isabel's updates. >> >> M-1286 - Peng and >> Sebastian, we had talked about this during the last hangout. Can this be >> included in 0.9? >> >> M-1030- Andrew Musselman, its critical that we get this into 0.9, its been >> deferred for last 2 Mahout releases. >> >> M-1319, M-1328, M-1347, M-1350 - Suneel >> >> >> M-1265 - Multi Layer Perceptron, Yexi please look at my comments on >> Reviewboard. >> >> M-1273 - Kun Yung, Ted, defer this to next release ??? >> >> >> >> M-1312, M-1256 - Stevo, could u take one of them >> >> >> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 5:01 AM, Isabel Drost-Fromm >> <isa...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:23:11 -0800 >> (PST) >> Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> Below are the Open issues for 0.9:- >> >> This looks like we should be targeting Dec. 9th as code freeze to me. >> What do you all think? >> >> >>> Mahout-1245, Mahout-1304, Mahout-1305, Mahout-1307, Mahout-1326 - All >>> related to Wiki updates, missing Wiki documentation and Wiki >>> migration to new CMS. Isabel's working on M-1245 (migrating to new >>> CMS). Could some of the others be consolidated with that? >> >> I believe MAHOUT-1245 essentially is ready to be published - all I want >> before notifying INFRA to >> switch to the new cms based site is one other >> person to take at least a brief look. >> >> For MAHOUT-1304 - Sebastian, can you please check that the cms based >> site actually does fit on 1280px? We can close this issue then. >> >> MAHOUT-1305 - I think this should be turned into a task to actually >> delete most of the pages that have been migrated to the new CMS (almost >> all of them). Once 1245 is shipped, it would be great if a few more >> people could lend a hand in getting this done. >> >> MAHOUT-1307 - Can be closed once switched to CMS >> >> MAHOUT-1326 - This really relates to the old Confluence export plugin >> we once have been using to generate static pages out of our wiki that >> is no longer active. Unless anyone on the Mahout dev list >> knows how to >> fully >> delete all exported static pages we should file an issue with >> INFRA to ask for help getting those deleted. They definitely are >> confusing to users. >> >> >> >>> M-1286 - Peng and ssc, we had talked about this during the last >>> hangout. Can this be included in 0.9? >>> >>> M-1030 - Andrew Musselman? Any updates on this, its important that we >>> fix this for 0.9 >>> >>> M-1319, M-1328, >>> M-1347, M-1364 - Suneel >>> >>> M-1273 - Kun Yung, remember talking about this in one of the earlier >>> hangouts; can't recall what was decided? >>> >>> M-1312, M-1256 - Dan Filimon (or Stevo??) >>> >>> M-996 someone could pick >> this up (if its still relevant with present >>> codebase i.e.) >> >> I think this can move to the next release - according to the >> contributor and Sebastian the patch is rather hacky and there for >> illustration purposes only. I'd rather see some more thought go into >> that instead of pushing to have this in 0.9. >> >> >>> M-1265 Yexi had submitted a patch for this, it would be good if this >>> could go in as part of 0.9 >>> >>> M-1288 Solr Recommender - Pat Ferrell >>> >>> M-1285: Any takers for this? >> >> Would be nice to have - in particular if someone on dev@ (not >> necessarily a committer) wants to get started with the code base. >> Otherwise I'd say fix for next release >> if time gets short. >> >> >>> M-1356: Isabel's started on this, Stevo could u review this? >> >> We definitely can punt that for the next release or even thereafter. It >> would be great if someone who has some knowledge of Java security >> policies would take a look. The implication of not fixing this >> essentially is that in case someone commits test code that writes >> outside of target or to some globally shared directory we might end up >> having randomly failing tests due to the parallel setup again. But as >> these will occur shortly after the commit it should be easy enough to >> find the code change that caused the breakage. >> >> >> >>> M-1329: Support for Hadoop 2 >> >> Is that truly feasable >> within a week? >> >> >>> M-1366: Stevo, Isabel ???? >> >> This should be done as part of the release process by release manager >> at the latest. >> >> >>> M-1261: Sebastian??? >>> >>> M-1309, M-1310, M-1311, M-1316 - all related to running Mahout on >>> Windows ?? >> >> I'm not aware of us supporting Windows. >> >> >>> M-1350 - Any takers?? (Stevo??) >> >> To me this looks like a broken classpath on the user side. Without a >> patch to at least re-produce the issue I wouldn't spend too much time >> >> on this. >> >> >> Isabel >
