Thanks; me too

> On Dec 1, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Sorry I am out on the streets but see M-1265 comments for a link to review 
> board 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 1, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> No, just reviewboard in general; never put any patches up before.
>> 
>>> On Dec 1, 2013, at 8:52 AM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> For M-1349??  There's no patch for this, no one's worked on it yet.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sunday, December 1, 2013 11:50 AM, Andrew Musselman 
>>> <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I will look at M-1349 since I'm in there.
>>> 
>>> Where's the Reviewboard.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> Open JIRAs for 0.9 release :-
>>> 
>>> Wiki - Isabel, Sebastian and other volunteers
>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> M-1245, M-1304, M-1305, M-1307, M-1326
>>> 
>>> Suneel
>>> -----------
>>> M-1319, M-1328
>>> 
>>> Pat
>>> -------
>>> M-1288 Solr Recommender
>>> 
>>> Sebastian, Peng
>>> --------------------
>>> M-1286
>>> 
>>> Yexi, Suneel
>>> ---------------
>>> M-1265 - Multi Layer Perceptron
>>> Ted, do u have cycles to review this, the patch's up on Reviewboard.
>>> 
>>> Stevo, Isabel
>>> -----------------
>>> M-1366 - Please delete old releases from mirroring system
>>> M-1345 - Enable Randomized testing for all modules
>>> 
>>> Andrew
>>> ----------
>>> M-1030
>>> 
>>> Open Issues (any takers for these ???)
>>> --------------------------------------------
>>> M-1242
>>> M-1349
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Friday, November 29, 2013 12:07 PM, Sebastian Schelter 
>>> <ssc.o...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 29.11.2013 17:59, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>>> Open JIRAs for 0.9:
>>>> 
>>>> Mahout-1245, Mahout-1304, Mahout-1305, Mahout-1307, Mahout-1326 - related 
>>>> to Wiki updates.
>>>> Definitely appreciate more hands here to review/update the wiki
>>>> 
>>>> M-1286 - Peng and
>>>> Sebastian, no updates on this. Can this be included in 0.9?
>>> 
>>> I will look into this over the weekend!
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> M-1030 - Andrew Musselman
>>>> 
>>>> M-1319, M-1328 -  Suneel
>>>> 
>>>> M-1347 - Suneel, patch has been committed to trunk.
>>>> 
>>>> M-1265 - I have been working with Yexi on this. Ted, would u have time to 
>>>> review this; the code's on Reviewboard.
>>>> 
>>>> M-1288 - Sole Recommender, Pat Ferrel
>>>> 
>>>> M-1345: Isabel, Frank. I think we are good on this patch. Isabel, could u 
>>>> commit this to trunk?
>>>> 
>>>> M-1312: Stevo, could u look at this?
>>>> 
>>>> M-1349: Any takers for this??
>>>> 
>>>> Others: Spectral Kmeans clustering documentation (Shannon)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 10:38 AM, Suneel Marthi 
>>>> <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Adding Mahout-1349 to the list of JIRAs .
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 10:37 AM, Suneel Marthi 
>>>> <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Update on Open JIRAs for 0.9:
>>>> 
>>>> Mahout-1245, Mahout-1304, Mahout-1305, Mahout-1307, Mahout-1326 - all 
>>>> related to Wiki updates, please see Isabel's updates.
>>>> 
>>>> M-1286 - Peng and
>>>> Sebastian, we had talked about this during the last hangout. Can this be 
>>>> included in 0.9?
>>>> 
>>>> M-1030- Andrew Musselman, its critical that we get this into 0.9, its been 
>>>> deferred for last 2 Mahout releases.
>>>> 
>>>> M-1319, M-1328, M-1347, M-1350 - Suneel
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> M-1265 - Multi Layer Perceptron, Yexi please look at my comments on 
>>>> Reviewboard.
>>>> 
>>>> M-1273 - Kun Yung, Ted, defer this to next release ???
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> M-1312, M-1256 - Stevo, could u take one of them
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 5:01 AM, Isabel Drost-Fromm 
>>>> <isa...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:23:11 -0800
>>>> (PST)
>>>> Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> Below are the Open issues for 0.9:-
>>>> 
>>>> This looks like we should be targeting Dec. 9th as code freeze to me.
>>>> What do you all think?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Mahout-1245, Mahout-1304, Mahout-1305, Mahout-1307, Mahout-1326 - All
>>>>> related to Wiki updates, missing Wiki documentation and Wiki
>>>>> migration to new CMS.  Isabel's working on M-1245 (migrating to new
>>>>> CMS). Could some of the others be consolidated with that?
>>>> 
>>>> I believe MAHOUT-1245 essentially is ready to be published - all I want
>>>> before notifying INFRA to
>>>> switch to the new cms based site is one other
>>>> person to take at least a brief look.
>>>> 
>>>> For MAHOUT-1304 - Sebastian, can you please check that the cms based
>>>> site actually does fit on 1280px? We can close this issue then.
>>>> 
>>>> MAHOUT-1305 - I think this should be turned into a task to actually
>>>> delete most of the pages that have been migrated to the new CMS (almost
>>>> all of them). Once 1245 is shipped, it would be great if a few more
>>>> people could lend a hand in getting this done.
>>>> 
>>>> MAHOUT-1307 - Can be closed once switched to CMS
>>>> 
>>>> MAHOUT-1326 - This really relates to the old Confluence export plugin
>>>> we once have been using to generate static pages out of our wiki that
>>>> is no longer active. Unless anyone on the Mahout dev list
>>>> knows how to
>>>> fully
>>>> delete all exported static pages we should file an issue with
>>>> INFRA to ask for help getting those deleted. They definitely are
>>>> confusing to users.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> M-1286 - Peng and ssc, we had talked about this during the last
>>>>> hangout. Can this be included in 0.9?
>>>>> 
>>>>> M-1030 - Andrew Musselman? Any updates on this, its important that we
>>>>> fix this for 0.9
>>>>> 
>>>>> M-1319, M-1328,
>>>>> M-1347, M-1364 - Suneel
>>>>> 
>>>>> M-1273 - Kun Yung, remember talking about this in one of the earlier
>>>>> hangouts; can't recall what was decided?
>>>>> 
>>>>> M-1312, M-1256 - Dan Filimon (or Stevo??)
>>>>> 
>>>>> M-996  someone could pick
>>>> this up (if its still relevant with present
>>>>> codebase i.e.)
>>>> 
>>>> I think this can move to the next release - according to the
>>>> contributor and Sebastian the patch is rather hacky and there for
>>>> illustration purposes only. I'd rather see some more thought go into
>>>> that instead of pushing to have this in 0.9.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> M-1265 Yexi had submitted a patch for this, it would be good if this
>>>>> could go in as part of 0.9 
>>>>> 
>>>>> M-1288 Solr Recommender - Pat Ferrell
>>>>> 
>>>>> M-1285: Any takers for this?
>>>> 
>>>> Would be nice to have - in particular if someone on dev@ (not
>>>> necessarily a committer) wants to get started with the code base.
>>>> Otherwise I'd say fix for next release
>>>> if time gets short.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> M-1356: Isabel's started on this, Stevo could u review this?
>>>> 
>>>> We definitely can punt that for the next release or even thereafter. It
>>>> would be great if someone who has some knowledge of Java security
>>>> policies would take a look. The implication of not fixing this
>>>> essentially is that in case someone commits test code that writes
>>>> outside of target or to some globally shared directory we might end up
>>>> having randomly failing tests due to the parallel setup again. But as
>>>> these will occur shortly after the commit it should be easy enough to
>>>> find the code change that caused the breakage.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> M-1329: Support for Hadoop 2
>>>> 
>>>> Is that truly feasable
>>>> within a week?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> M-1366:  Stevo, Isabel ????
>>>> 
>>>> This should be done as part of the release process by release manager
>>>> at the latest.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> M-1261: Sebastian???
>>>>> 
>>>>> M-1309, M-1310, M-1311, M-1316 - all related to running Mahout on
>>>>> Windows ??
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not aware of us supporting Windows.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> M-1350 - Any takers?? (Stevo??)
>>>> 
>>>> To me this looks like a broken classpath on the user side. Without a
>>>> patch to at least re-produce the issue I wouldn't spend too much time
>>>> 
>>>> on this.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Isabel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 

Reply via email to