[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14031187#comment-14031187
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MAHOUT-1464:
----------------------------------------

Github user dlyubimov commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/18#discussion_r13772128
  
    --- Diff: math/src/main/java/org/apache/mahout/math/function/Functions.java 
---
    @@ -1393,6 +1393,17 @@ public double apply(double a) {
         };
       }
     
    +  /** Constructs a function that returns <tt>a != b ? 1 : 0</tt>. 
<tt>a</tt> is a variable, <tt>b</tt> is fixed. */
    +  public static DoubleFunction notEqual(final double b) {
    +    return new DoubleFunction() {
    +
    +      @Override
    +      public double apply(double a) {
    +        return a != b ? 1 : 0;
    --- End diff --
    
    just relaying some historical discussion in Mahout. It was known to create 
a bug in my own Mahout commit once. Which had sparked the discussion about 
constant formatting.


> Cooccurrence Analysis on Spark
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-1464
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1464
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Collaborative Filtering
>         Environment: hadoop, spark
>            Reporter: Pat Ferrel
>            Assignee: Pat Ferrel
>             Fix For: 1.0
>
>         Attachments: MAHOUT-1464.patch, MAHOUT-1464.patch, MAHOUT-1464.patch, 
> MAHOUT-1464.patch, MAHOUT-1464.patch, MAHOUT-1464.patch, run-spark-xrsj.sh
>
>
> Create a version of Cooccurrence Analysis (RowSimilarityJob with LLR) that 
> runs on Spark. This should be compatible with Mahout Spark DRM DSL so a DRM 
> can be used as input. 
> Ideally this would extend to cover MAHOUT-1422. This cross-cooccurrence has 
> several applications including cross-action recommendations. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to