From a big picture perspective do we intend to keep colt around or write scala implementations for functions like the aggregate, if so then I can add scala code to do the aggregation and call it from the DSL for the norm.
Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 25, 2014, at 12:25 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Aggregate is Colt's thing. Colt (aka Mahout-math) establish java-side >> concept of different function types which are unfortunately not compatible >> with Scala literals. > > Dmitriy, > > Is this because we have other methods that describe the characteristics of > the function? > > What would be the Scala friendly idiom? Additional traits?
