After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally, I
am fine with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ah... forgot this.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
> {binary,source}
> > x
> > > {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
> > >
> > > One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
> > > doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
> > > seems a good thing to do.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> suneel.mar...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> > >>
> > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> > >>
> > >> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
> > >> release to pass.
> > >>
> > >> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Suneel
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
> Will
> > >> > require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> > >> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Running on EMR now.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> > >> > artifacts
> > >> > > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
> of
> > my
> > >> > > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
> > correctly
> > >> > from
> > >> > > the artifacts.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> suneel.mar...@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
> +1
> > >> votes
> > >> > > for the candidate release to pass.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> > work
> > >> > over
> > >> > > the past few weeks.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Regards,
> > >> > > Suneel
> > >> > > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
