+1 from non-PMC :)

iPhone'd

> On Apr 11, 2015, at 12:25, Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks everyone. We have had 5  +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
> passed and the Voting officially closes.
> Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.
> 
> Thanks again.
> 
>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it looks
>> good to me
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 
>> On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> wrote:
>> 
>> After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and testing
>> the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with this
>> release.
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>>> On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>> After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally,
>> I
>>> am fine with this release.
>>> 
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>>> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
>>>> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
>>>> 
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Ah... forgot this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
>>>> {binary,source}
>>>>> x
>>>>>> {zip,tar} + pom.  All were correct.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
>>>>>> doesn't include "apache".  Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
>>>>>> seems a good thing to do.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>>>> suneel.mar...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
>>>>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow.  Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
>>>>>>> release to pass.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Grant, Ted:  Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Suneel
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
>>>> Will
>>>>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>>>>>>> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Running on EMR now.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
>>>>>>>> artifacts
>>>>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
>>>> of
>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
>>>>> correctly
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> the artifacts.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>>>> suneel.mar...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
>>>>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
>>>> +1
>>>>>>> votes
>>>>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
>>>>> work
>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>> the past few weeks.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Suneel
>>>>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to