if I can get a copy of your notes :) ________________________________________ From: Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:17 PM To: dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.
I can be the Release Manager for this.. ________________________________________ From: Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:15 PM To: mahout Subject: Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release. ...and work for 0.12.1 would be on master branch On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > For 0.12.1, the 2 issues below along with a Jira to polish the scaladocs > for Flink backend that pretty much don't exist now. > > Also the Scaladocs for 0.12.1 to be published with the release, that > should suffice as scope for 0.12.1. > > I agree Flink shell should be differed to 0.13.0 as its not stable yet, > but we can start working on that in a separate branch. > > If someone from the PMC could volunteer to be the Release Manager for > 0.12.1 that would be great. > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> > wrote: > >> Flink will soon be releasing 1.0.2, which includes a kryo fix that should >> help us with the following issues: >> >> >> FlinkOpABt: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750 >> >> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750> >> >> Flink Dals error: >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818 >> >> >> >> As well we may be able to work the Flink Shell in along with these: >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1831 >> >> >> Though that might be better to save for Mahout 0.13 as it is both a new >> feature and I've noticed that Flink has some issues with this that may not >> be addressed until a later release. >> >> >> Is there anything on the Spark side of things that needs to be >> addressed? Or anything else in general? >> > >