I'll leave the artifacts up there in case that helps troubleshooting,
otherwise let me know and I'll drop them.

Thanks

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'll look for you online later today for the hangout.
>
> Is there a reason we have the project.version only in the viennacl-omp
> artifact block for the viennacl profile?
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, We have 2 new modules each which builds with a profile `viennacl`
>> and `viennacl-omp`
>>
>>
>> - the `viennacl` profile builds for both modules `viennacl` and
>> `viennacl-omp`
>>
>> - we are trying to build and release for both modules
>>
>> - yesterday Andrew and I (without my keys in .m2 to ensure I didnt writ
>> over anything) both tried to do this with
>>
>>
>>     `mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
>> release:prepare release:perform`
>>
>>
>> After doing that, the release came up with out the jars for both new
>> modules:
>>
>>  - mahout-native-viennacl_2.10-0.13.0.jar the GPU viennacl jar
>>
>>  - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar.
>>
>>
>> With the -Pviennacl  the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP,
>> the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both.
>>
>>
>> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that as
>> well.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM
>> To: mahout
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>
>> I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check - on
>> flights today - will only be available late night
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla
>> > (non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will allow
>> > users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will suffice.
>> >
>> > There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in
>> > distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should know
>> > better.
>> >
>> > We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same page.
>> >
>> > Thanks Suneel and Stevo.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > If I understood problem and goal well:
>> > > - module with native code has to be included in the release
>> > > -- module version change only and I guess documentation published but
>> > > -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging binary/jar
>> > etc.
>> > > and
>> > > -- distribution module should include sources of module with native
>> code
>> > > too
>> > > - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources
>> > distribution,
>> > > for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything
>> including
>> > > their own jar of native module for given target architecture.
>> > >
>> > > This is not easy to achieve with Maven.
>> > >
>> > > Kind regards,
>> > > Stevo Slavic.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or being
>> > > > shadowed ?  i can take a look later tonight.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>> > > > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands
>> the
>> > > fine
>> > > > > points of making things like this works?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
>> > > > > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <
>> ap....@outlook.com
>> > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
>> > > release:prepare
>> > > > > >> release:perform
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> ________________________________
>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com>
>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression.   My
>> > guess
>> > > > is
>> > > > > >> that they were missing before.  I think that this may have
>> > something
>> > > > to
>> > > > > do
>> > > > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> ________________________________
>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; u...@mahout.apache.org
>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <
>> > ap....@outlook.com>
>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > bin
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > conf                            mahout-math-0.13.0.jar
>> derby.log
>> > > > > >> >              mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
>> > > > > >> >     mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
>> > > > > >> >  mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
>> > > > > >> >      mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
>> > > > > >> >  metastore_db LICENSE.txt                     NOTICE.txt
>> > > > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar      README.md
>> > > > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
>> > > > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar          viennacl-omp
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > ________________________________
>> > > > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
>> > > > > >> > To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
>> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing
>> tests
>> > > for
>> > > > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example
>> in
>> > > the
>> > > > > >> binary
>> > > > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get
>> exercised
>> > > > when
>> > > > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores
>> on
>> > the
>> > > > CPU
>> > > > > >> get
>> > > > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>> > > > > >> > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be
>> > closed
>> > > on
>> > > > > >> > Friday,
>> > > > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1
>> binding
>> > > votes
>> > > > > >> > (whichever
>> > > > > >> > > occurs earlier).  Please download, test and vote with
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
>> > > Mahout
>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
>> > > > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of
>> > > Apache
>> > > > > >> Mahout,
>> > > > > >> > > because...
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > Maven staging repo:
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > *
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
>> > > > > >> > > <
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
>> > > > > >> > >*
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to