u can roll this back, i see the issue. and shuld have a PR fix.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Andrew Musselman < andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > If we can get a quorum tomorrow morning Pacific let's get whoever can join > on a hangout; I'll keep an eye on this thread and set up a hangout when we > have a good time. > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:02 AM Andrew Musselman < > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'll leave the artifacts up there in case that helps troubleshooting, > > otherwise let me know and I'll drop them. > > > > Thanks > > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Musselman < > > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I'll look for you online later today for the hangout. > >> > >> Is there a reason we have the project.version only in the viennacl-omp > >> artifact block for the viennacl profile? > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Yes, We have 2 new modules each which builds with a profile `viennacl` > >>> and `viennacl-omp` > >>> > >>> > >>> - the `viennacl` profile builds for both modules `viennacl` and > >>> `viennacl-omp` > >>> > >>> - we are trying to build and release for both modules > >>> > >>> - yesterday Andrew and I (without my keys in .m2 to ensure I didnt writ > >>> over anything) both tried to do this with > >>> > >>> > >>> `mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 > >>> release:prepare release:perform` > >>> > >>> > >>> After doing that, the release came up with out the jars for both new > >>> modules: > >>> > >>> - mahout-native-viennacl_2.10-0.13.0.jar the GPU viennacl jar > >>> > >>> - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar. > >>> > >>> > >>> With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP, > >>> the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both. > >>> > >>> > >>> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that > as > >>> well. > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> > >>> Andy > >>> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> From: Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> > >>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM > >>> To: mahout > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate > >>> > >>> I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check - > on > >>> flights today - will only be available late night > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Musselman < > >>> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla > >>> > (non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will > allow > >>> > users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will > suffice. > >>> > > >>> > There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in > >>> > distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should > know > >>> > better. > >>> > > >>> > We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same > >>> page. > >>> > > >>> > Thanks Suneel and Stevo. > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > If I understood problem and goal well: > >>> > > - module with native code has to be included in the release > >>> > > -- module version change only and I guess documentation published > but > >>> > > -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging > >>> binary/jar > >>> > etc. > >>> > > and > >>> > > -- distribution module should include sources of module with native > >>> code > >>> > > too > >>> > > - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources > >>> > distribution, > >>> > > for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything > >>> including > >>> > > their own jar of native module for given target architecture. > >>> > > > >>> > > This is not easy to achieve with Maven. > >>> > > > >>> > > Kind regards, > >>> > > Stevo Slavic. > >>> > > > >>> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org > > > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or > being > >>> > > > shadowed ? i can take a look later tonight. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman < > >>> > > > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands > >>> the > >>> > > fine > >>> > > > > points of making things like this works? > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman < > >>> > > > > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > > wrote: > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo < > >>> ap....@outlook.com > >>> > > > >>> > > > > wrote: > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day: > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 > >>> > > release:prepare > >>> > > > > >> release:perform > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> ________________________________ > >>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> > >>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM > >>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org > >>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. > My > >>> > guess > >>> > > > is > >>> > > > > >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have > >>> > something > >>> > > > to > >>> > > > > do > >>> > > > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time. > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> ________________________________ > >>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM > >>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; u...@mahout.apache.org > >>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know? > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo < > >>> > ap....@outlook.com> > >>> > > > > >> wrote: > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary > >>> distro: > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > bin > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar > >>> derby.log > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib > >>> > > > > >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md > >>> > > > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar > >>> > > > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > ________________________________ > >>> > > > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM > >>> > > > > >> > To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org > >>> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing > >>> tests > >>> > > for > >>> > > > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles. > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala > >>> example in > >>> > > the > >>> > > > > >> binary > >>> > > > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get > >>> exercised > >>> > > > when > >>> > > > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all > cores > >>> on > >>> > the > >>> > > > CPU > >>> > > > > >> get > >>> > > > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from > source. > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding). > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman < > >>> > > > > >> > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. > >>> > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be > >>> > closed > >>> > > on > >>> > > > > >> > Friday, > >>> > > > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 > >>> binding > >>> > > votes > >>> > > > > >> > (whichever > >>> > > > > >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with > >>> > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of > Apache > >>> > > Mahout > >>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way, > >>> > > > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release > of > >>> > > Apache > >>> > > > > >> Mahout, > >>> > > > > >> > > because... > >>> > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > >> > > Maven staging repo: > >>> > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > >> > > * > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout- > >>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/ > >>> > > > > >> > > < > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout- > >>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/ > >>> > > > > >> > >* > >>> > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0 > >>> > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > > >