u can roll this back, i see the issue.

and shuld have a PR fix.

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If we can get a quorum tomorrow morning Pacific let's get whoever can join
> on a hangout; I'll keep an eye on this thread and set up a hangout when we
> have a good time.
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:02 AM Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'll leave the artifacts up there in case that helps troubleshooting,
> > otherwise let me know and I'll drop them.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'll look for you online later today for the hangout.
> >>
> >> Is there a reason we have the project.version only in the viennacl-omp
> >> artifact block for the viennacl profile?
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, We have 2 new modules each which builds with a profile `viennacl`
> >>> and `viennacl-omp`
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - the `viennacl` profile builds for both modules `viennacl` and
> >>> `viennacl-omp`
> >>>
> >>> - we are trying to build and release for both modules
> >>>
> >>> - yesterday Andrew and I (without my keys in .m2 to ensure I didnt writ
> >>> over anything) both tried to do this with
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     `mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
> >>> release:prepare release:perform`
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> After doing that, the release came up with out the jars for both new
> >>> modules:
> >>>
> >>>  - mahout-native-viennacl_2.10-0.13.0.jar the GPU viennacl jar
> >>>
> >>>  - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> With the -Pviennacl  the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP,
> >>> the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that
> as
> >>> well.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Andy
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
> >>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM
> >>> To: mahout
> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >>>
> >>> I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check -
> on
> >>> flights today - will only be available late night
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> >>> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla
> >>> > (non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will
> allow
> >>> > users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will
> suffice.
> >>> >
> >>> > There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in
> >>> > distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should
> know
> >>> > better.
> >>> >
> >>> > We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same
> >>> page.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks Suneel and Stevo.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > If I understood problem and goal well:
> >>> > > - module with native code has to be included in the release
> >>> > > -- module version change only and I guess documentation published
> but
> >>> > > -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging
> >>> binary/jar
> >>> > etc.
> >>> > > and
> >>> > > -- distribution module should include sources of module with native
> >>> code
> >>> > > too
> >>> > > - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources
> >>> > distribution,
> >>> > > for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything
> >>> including
> >>> > > their own jar of native module for given target architecture.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > This is not easy to achieve with Maven.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Kind regards,
> >>> > > Stevo Slavic.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org
> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or
> being
> >>> > > > shadowed ?  i can take a look later tonight.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> >>> > > > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands
> >>> the
> >>> > > fine
> >>> > > > > points of making things like this works?
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
> >>> > > > > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
> >>> > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <
> >>> ap....@outlook.com
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
> >>> > > release:prepare
> >>> > > > > >> release:perform
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> ________________________________
> >>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com>
> >>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> >>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> >>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression.
>  My
> >>> > guess
> >>> > > > is
> >>> > > > > >> that they were missing before.  I think that this may have
> >>> > something
> >>> > > > to
> >>> > > > > do
> >>> > > > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> ________________________________
> >>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
> >>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
> >>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; u...@mahout.apache.org
> >>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <
> >>> > ap....@outlook.com>
> >>> > > > > >> wrote:
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary
> >>> distro:
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > bin
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > conf                            mahout-math-0.13.0.jar
> >>> derby.log
> >>> > > > > >> >              mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> >>> > > > > >> >     mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> >>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> >>> > > > > >> >  mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> >>> > > > > >> >      mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> >>> > > > > >> >  metastore_db LICENSE.txt                     NOTICE.txt
> >>> > > > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar      README.md
> >>> > > > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> >>> > > > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar          viennacl-omp
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > ________________________________
> >>> > > > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
> >>> > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> >>> > > > > >> > To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> >>> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing
> >>> tests
> >>> > > for
> >>> > > > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala
> >>> example in
> >>> > > the
> >>> > > > > >> binary
> >>> > > > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get
> >>> exercised
> >>> > > > when
> >>> > > > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all
> cores
> >>> on
> >>> > the
> >>> > > > CPU
> >>> > > > > >> get
> >>> > > > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from
> source.
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> >>> > > > > >> > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be
> >>> > closed
> >>> > > on
> >>> > > > > >> > Friday,
> >>> > > > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1
> >>> binding
> >>> > > votes
> >>> > > > > >> > (whichever
> >>> > > > > >> > > occurs earlier).  Please download, test and vote with
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of
> Apache
> >>> > > Mahout
> >>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> >>> > > > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release
> of
> >>> > > Apache
> >>> > > > > >> Mahout,
> >>> > > > > >> > > because...
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> > > Maven staging repo:
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> > > *
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> >>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
> >>> > > > > >> > > <
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> >>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
> >>> > > > > >> > >*
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to