Hi,
Sad to see you didn't merge my changes in "issue/MAHOUT-2117" back to master
before cutting the next RC :-(
So I'm not going to vote this time as the result would be the same as last time
...
Chris
Am 11.09.20, 03:17 schrieb "Trevor Grant" <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com>:
Thank you so much for getting this out Andrew.
I verified all checksums/sigs.
I successfully built the source including all tests. (I did this in the
public docker container rawkintrevo/mahout-builder-base)
I also tested the binaries in the public docker container
rawkintrevo/mahoutgui , but bashing into the running container, unpacking
both the binary archives, and then aiming and running the mahout example
notebook in turn against each of the unpacked binaries from each of the
archives. I did this in place of spark-shell, as I think it's a more
elegant solution going forward, but would encourage others to test against
mahout spark-shell.
So given all of that, I give an enthusiastic +1
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:37 PM Andrew Musselman <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> Binaries:
>
>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1065/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/14.1/
>
> Source:
>
>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1065/org/apache/mahout/mahout/14.1/
>
> Please check checksums and signatures, run the shell, do some computation,
> run your favorite jobs, and let us know how it looks.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best
> Andrew
>
