I am +1 (binding) on this release; I have: (1) Downloaded both binary and source releases (2) Verified checksums and signatures (3) Built from source (4) Run the spark-shell, and loaded and run the sparse DRM multiplier function for both distros:
Note that in the source build the shell script is `./distribution/target/apache-mahout-14.1/bin/mahout spark-shell`. scala> :load /home/akm/a/src/test/ repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1066/org/apache/mahout/mahout/14.1/apache-mahout-14.1/distribution/target/apache-mahout-14.1/examples/bin/SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala Loading /home/akm/a/src/test/ repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1066/org/apache/mahout/mahout/14.1/apache-mahout-14.1/distribution/target/apache-mahout-14.1/examples/bin/SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala. .. timeSparseDRMMMul: (m: Int, n: Int, s: Int, para: Int, pctDense: Double, seed: Long)Long scala> timeSparseDRMMMul(1000,1000,1000,1,.02,1234L) res6: Long = 2205 So far that is two binding +1 votes and two non-binding +1 votes, with no -1 votes. Still looking for another PMC vote. On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 6:45 PM Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for the delay on my vote. > > Sigs checked out- source built without issues and passed all tests. > Additional tests as described on RC6 candidate. > > I'm +1 binding. > > Thanks again Andrew!! > > tg > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:56 PM Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Away from my computer on vacation- if it's still up next week I can vote. > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020, 11:27 AM Christofer Dutz < > christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > wrote: > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the > release > >> vote email into a directory we’ll now call download-dir. > >> [MINOR] Verify the signature is correct: Additional Apache tutorial on > >> how to verify downloads can be found here. > >> [OK] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. > >> [MINOR] Verify the SHA512 hashes: > >> [OK] Unzip the archive > >> [OK] Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README files in the > >> extracted source bundle. > >> [MINOR] Verify the content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README files in the > >> extracted source bundle. > >> [MINOR] Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. > >> [MINOR] Search for SNAPSHOT references > >> [OK] Search for Copyright references, and if they are in headers, make > >> sure these files containing them are mentioned in the LICENSE file. > >> [OK] Build the project according to the information in the README.md > file. > >> > >> Remarks: > >> - The signature is correct, but no secure trust chain could be > >> established (Possibly worth attending a Key-Signing-Party as soon as > they > >> are happening again) > >> - There are no SHA512 hashes, I validated against the SHA1 hashes > instead > >> - Two CERN files weren't listed in the LICENSE > (KeyTypeValueTypeProcedure > >> , ValueTypeComparator) > >> - One CERN file still has a double CERN/Apache Header (NegativeBinomial) > >> - The community modules all contain SNAPSHOT references as they weren't > >> enabled in the release > >> - The distribution references SNAPSHOT versions of community modules > >> (However not in an always-on profile) > >> > >> > >> > >> Am 11.09.20, 19:18 schrieb "Andrew Musselman" < > >> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> My bad, RC7 out now! > >> > >> Binaries: > >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1066/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/14.1/ > >> > >> Source: > >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1066/org/apache/mahout/mahout/14.1/ > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 1:04 AM Christofer Dutz < > >> christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Sad to see you didn't merge my changes in "issue/MAHOUT-2117" back > >> to > >> > master before cutting the next RC :-( > >> > > >> > So I'm not going to vote this time as the result would be the same > >> as last > >> > time ... > >> > > >> > Chris > >> > > >> > > >> > Am 11.09.20, 03:17 schrieb "Trevor Grant" < > trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com > >> >: > >> > > >> > Thank you so much for getting this out Andrew. > >> > > >> > I verified all checksums/sigs. > >> > > >> > I successfully built the source including all tests. (I did > >> this in the > >> > public docker container rawkintrevo/mahout-builder-base) > >> > > >> > I also tested the binaries in the public docker container > >> > rawkintrevo/mahoutgui , but bashing into the running > container, > >> > unpacking > >> > both the binary archives, and then aiming and running the > mahout > >> > example > >> > notebook in turn against each of the unpacked binaries from > >> each of the > >> > archives. I did this in place of spark-shell, as I think it's > >> a more > >> > elegant solution going forward, but would encourage others to > >> test > >> > against > >> > mahout spark-shell. > >> > > >> > So given all of that, I give an enthusiastic +1 > >> > > >> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:37 PM Andrew Musselman < > >> a...@apache.org> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Binaries: > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1065/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/14.1/ > >> > > > >> > > Source: > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1065/org/apache/mahout/mahout/14.1/ > >> > > > >> > > Please check checksums and signatures, run the shell, do > some > >> > computation, > >> > > run your favorite jobs, and let us know how it looks. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks! > >> > > > >> > > Best > >> > > Andrew > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >
