Ok, will look into it....how will this change the code? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/08/2003 02:56:40 PM: > ArtifactType considers ejb a type (which is what dep.type will be), but also > knows the filename extension is ".jar". > > IMO it makes sense to keep this logic together. > > - Brett > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, 12 August 2003 2:58 PM > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: RE: cvs commit: > > maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/project Project.j ava > > > > > > What's the difference between dependency.type and ArtifactType? > > -- > > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ > > > > > > Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/08/2003 > > 04:32:38 PM: > > > > > Should this be working with Artifacts? That way, this > > method could be > > > in ArtifactType. > > > > > > > /** > > > > - * Currently this is just jars. > > > > + * Jars and ejbs. > > > > * > > > > * @param d > > > > * @return true if the given dependency belongs on the > > > > classpath > > > > */ > > > > private boolean isClasspathDependency(Dependency d) > > > > { > > > > - return d.getType().equals( "jar" ); > > > > + return d.getType().equals( "jar" ) || > > > > d.getType().equals( "ejb" ); > > > > } > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Brett > >
