On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 20:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Any reason to remove the class javadoc?
Majority of is either generated, only partially correct or just plain wrong. In most cases I find nothing is better as it can't be misleading and after working on some packages like xstream that just have sensibly named methods and variables is good enough and in fact I think better. So while I'm cleaning up I'll be renaming some things as MavenJeezTagLibrary doesn't really mean a whole lot. Though it's readily apparent from the code what is does it still should be renamed. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://maven.apache.org happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it will elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will come and sit softly on your shoulder ... -- Thoreau --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
