Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/01/2004 04:08:00 PM: > On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 20:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Any reason to remove the class javadoc? > > Majority of is either generated, only partially correct or just plain > wrong. In most cases I find nothing is better as it can't be misleading > and after working on some packages like xstream that just have sensibly > named methods and variables is good enough and in fact I think better. > > So while I'm cleaning up I'll be renaming some things as > MavenJeezTagLibrary doesn't really mean a whole lot. Though it's readily > apparent from the code what is does it still should be renamed.
Sounds great. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
