Hi Mark, Mark Derricutt wrote:
> On 7 Apr 2014, at 12:32, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> We then have other logical classpaths. . Something like javadoc should >> be able to define another named classpath structure; combining the >> dependencies of the plugin's implementation with dynamic code >> (doclets, whatever) seems like a category confusion to me. > > If we change/break this - can we PLEASE make the compilation path IGNORE > transitive dependencies of 'compile' dependencies - if I -need- it to > compile, -I- should depend on it up front. I made the same request more than 7 years ago (https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2589). However, you can already force such a mode with some own effort using a common POM with a depMgmt section declaring anything with runtime scope. Unfortunately such a mode reveals some nasty effects of the Java model and we finally gave in. See my comment in MNG-2589 of last year. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
