Yes On 10 October 2014 13:12, Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote:
> If you do a quick search on Central, you'll that even other Apache project > don't adhere to this convention. Should they receive a C&D too? > > Michael > > > We just need to show best effort to defend our trademark... if we *see* > > anyone doing that then we have to send them C&D letters... > > > > Note: my understanding is that we only have to send C&D letters when we > > know somebody is abusing our mark... we don't necessarily have to go > > actively looking for people abusing our mark... just if we went looking > and > > found any then we have to send them C&Ds quite quickly > > > > On 10 October 2014 12:45, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Stephen Connolly > > > <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > We, the PMC, agreed to allow permitted usage of the form > ___-maven-plugin > > > > as that clarified that the plugin was a plugin for maven not one > produced > > > > by maven > > > > > > Yea, I know, and I'm not opposed to making the tooling more > > > obstreperous. I'm just warning people not to have high hopes of > > > enforcement for anyone who chooses to hack the tooling and not > > > cooperate. > > > > > > > > > > > On 10 October 2014 12:40, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Keep in mind that what we have here is almost certainly a > > > >> _convention_, not a point of trademark law. As I understand it, we'd > > > >> as likely be laughed at for the suggestion that reversing the order > of > > > >> the components of a name leads to 'marketplace confusion' at the > level > > > >> at which trademarks can be enforced. > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> >> They should rename going forward. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> At some point (probably we could do so now) we will turn on > > > enforcement > > > >> in > > > >> >> the maven-plugin-plugin. > > > >> > > > > >> > This will of course piss of a lot of people. Wouldn't it? > > > >> > > > > >> > There are, of course, several reasons why people can't: > > > >> > > > > >> > 1. Popularity of the old name > > > >> > 2. Technical reasons > > > >> > 3. Name collisions > > > >> > > > > >> > etc. > > > >> > > > > >> > Even if we enforce this, this should not happen before Maven 4 and > > > >> should be added to the plugin dev center. > > > >> > > > > >> > Michael > > > >> > > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
