So, I have this 2.6 branch, but it's tightly my Snappy obsession. So
is that what you all mean, or do you want a large subset of the trunk
in there, possibly up to and including the current end of the trunk?

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote:
> I agree with Robert; it would be great to do lots of cleanup (remove
> deprecated goals for starters) in a 3.0 version. So doing a v2.6 now would
> keep that option open.
>
> /Anders
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> IIRC for maven-assembly-plugin most of the actions have been done as
>> stated in the migration strategy[1]
>>
>> Due to not knowing about maven-artifact-transfer the plugin contains some
>> equivalent code, but the custom code doesn't work for all M3.0+ versions (I
>> think only 3.0.4 and above).
>> AFAIK it still uses ArtifactFactory, which means that still the legacy
>> code is used instead of Aether, meaning it would be Maven3+ in name only.
>> I'm not convinced that the API of maven-artifact-transfer is ready, but
>> since this plugin isn't using it, I'm open to go for m-assembly-p 3.0,
>> although I'd prefer 2.6, because it would be THE moment to remove
>> deprecated code. For that reason I ask in general: please do a
>> pre-announcement when going for a plugin 3.0 release, so we can have a good
>> and critical look at it.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Robert
>>
>> [1]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Plugin+migration+to+Maven3+dependencies
>>
>> Op Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:05:24 +0200 schreef Benson Margulies <
>> bimargul...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
>>> <kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Personally I'd release 3.0.0 and stuff whatever nit-picky requirements
>>>> are not met. Revert any changes that depends on code that is not yet
>>>> ready for release. I think ultimately the large list of requirements
>>>> is a nice way to just halt all progress.
>>>>
>>>> It'll be at least a jdk 1.6 release no matter what.
>>>>
>>>
>>> My aim is to have the minimum of controversy here. If Robert and the
>>> other laborers on the trunk hate your idea, I'll stick with my idea.
>>> I'd just like to do _something_ this week.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Kristian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-10-05 2:47 GMT+02:00 Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> I have my itch scratched on the 2.6 branch. If anyone else wants to
>>>>> pull something else onto the branch before I release 2.6.0, please
>>>>> speak up.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, will do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Benson,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> just update the branch. I have checked in a fix for that...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You need simply to define Java 6 as target/source otherwise the
>>>>>>> parent will
>>>>>>> control that which is there by default 1.5...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would suggest to make 2.6.0 which identifies as JDK
>>>>>>> 6...requirement....3.0.0 should be reserved for Maven 3.0+ plugins...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>>>>>>> On 10/4/15 11:41 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What can I do to help move the 3.0 effort along?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or, alternatively, what would it take to get a consensus to move to
>>>>>>>> Java 1.6 for m-a-p 2.6?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm stuck on...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The version of plexus I need to get the feature I want requires 1.6,
>>>>>>>> and the existing code is insisting on 1.5.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce
>>>>>>>> (enforce-bytecode-version) @ maven-assembly-plugin ---
>>>>>>>> [INFO] Restricted to JDK 1.5 yet
>>>>>>>> org.iq80.snappy:snappy:jar:0.3:compile contains
>>>>>>>> org/iq80/snappy/BufferRecycler.class targeted to JDK 1.6
>>>>>>>> [INFO] Restricted to JDK 1.5 yet
>>>>>>>> org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-archiver:jar:3.0.1:compile contains
>>>>>>>> org/codehaus/plexus/archiver/UnixStat.class targeted to JDK 1.6
>>>>>>>> [WARNING] Rule 0:
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.EnforceBytecodeVersion failed with
>>>>>>>> message:
>>>>>>>> Found Banned Dependency: org.iq80.snappy:snappy:jar:0.3
>>>>>>>> Found Banned Dependency:
>>>>>>>> org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-archiver:jar:3.0.1
>>>>>>>> Use 'mvn dependency:tree' to locate the source of the banned
>>>>>>>> dependencies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Benson Margulies <
>>>>>>>> bimargul...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 4, 2015 4:08 PM, "Dennis Lundberg" <denn...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  From what I have read we need to move all of maven-plugins to git
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>> go.
>>>>>>>>>> See the thread "Full migration to Git" for more info
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I guess I'll have to go tune into that thread.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2015-10-04 14:07 GMT+02:00 Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OK, then, I want to move it to git first. Any objections?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <
>>>>>>>>>>> khmarba...@gmx.de>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/4/15 10:58 AM, Robert Scholte wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm, I see we tried to start with a 3.0.0 version, so not on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> trunk.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assembly is far from ready as M3-only, so I suggest branching
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> latest
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tag.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes that's the way to make a fix release...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:26:18 +0200 schreef Benson Margulies
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bimargul...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could we do this? I'm waiting on the 'snappy' support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Dennis Lundberg
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to