Yeah, I sort of understand.

But that really means there is no "good" use case for letting shade
read classes from target/classes within the reactor....(?)

Kristian


2015-11-14 20:15 GMT+01:00 Igor Fedorenko <[email protected]>:
> Run the build with -X and see what mojos are executed for mshade171-base
> project:
>
>     [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @
>     mshade171-base ---
>     [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.6:resources (default-resources)
>     @ mshade171-base ---
>     [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:compile (default-compile) @
>     mshade171-base ---
>     [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.6:testResources
>     (default-testResources) @ mshade171-base ---
>     [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:testCompile
>     (default-testCompile) @ mshade171-base ---
>     [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12.4:test (default-test) @
>     mshade171-base ---
>     [INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:2.4:jar (default-jar) @ mshade171-base
>     ---
>     [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.6:resources (default-resources)
>     @ mshade171-base ---
>     [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:compile (default-compile) @
>     mshade171-base ---
>     [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.6:testResources
>     (default-testResources) @ mshade171-base ---
>     [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:testCompile
>     (default-testCompile) @ mshade171-base ---
>     [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12.4:test (default-test) @
>     mshade171-base ---
>
>
> Although jar:jar sets project artifact file to packaged jar, the second
> compiler:compile compile invocation sets it back to target/classes
> folder.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015, at 09:55 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>> I've been using the test project attached to
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-171, single threaded.
>> Shade is bound to package.
>>
>> I really dont understand this :)
>>
>> K
>>
>>
>> 2015-11-14 13:57 GMT+01:00 Igor Fedorenko <[email protected]>:
>> > I believe "mvn clean package" runs the default lifecycle twice, first to
>> > "package" phase, when reactor dependencies are resolved to packaged
>> > jars, then to "test" phase, when reactor dependencies are resolved to
>> > target/classes folders. I am surprised shade plugin is called during
>> > "test" run at all. What phase is the plugin bound to in your project?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> > Igor
>> >
>> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015, at 06:45 AM, Robert Scholte wrote:
>> >> Op Sat, 14 Nov 2015 11:53:41 +0100 schreef Kristian Rosenvold
>> >> <[email protected]>:
>> >>
>> >> > While working on MSHADE-171, I figured I'd take a stab at making shade
>> >> > work from the "target" folder instead of just the assembled finished
>> >> > jar.
>> >> >
>> >> > I implemented this, and it works kinda-ok, but then I realized that
>> >> > I'm not producing the same output as I would from "package", since
>> >> > there is no META-INF in the "target" folder of a reactor dependency.
>> >> >
>> >> > The user here is issuing a command like "mvn clean package test".
>> >> > Given this command the reactor references resolve to the "target"
>> >> > folder, can someone explain this to me ? If I just do "mvn clean
>> >> > package" it resolves to the jar file.
>> >>
>> >> And only one thread?
>> >>
>> >> Robert
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm probably the last guy to realize this, but this patch is a dead
>> >> > end, right ? So we should probably just make shade a little more
>> >> > verbose about what's going on; that we actually require a jar file ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Kristian
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to