I don't see that this needs a special name, so I am -1 on Akasha I like Maven Artifact Resolver API... but my only concern with the "mara" short form is that I'll keep replaying radio satire in my head every time I say it, e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6ITDfkwKTA
What exactly is wrong with org.apache.maven.ara or org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.api if we compare with org.apache.maven.mara to me the m in mara is redundant because we already have the maven... so either if we want a short package name then `ara` is better... or we want an understandable package name... same goes for artifactIds On 28 July 2016 at 08:13, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The work on Aether import is progressing: as I commented on MNG-6007 > recently, > we now have to find a new name for the component at Apache. Then we'll > update > poms, documentation and git repo accordingly and we'll be ready to make > releases. > > We already have first ideas, found by the PMC while working in private on > the > topic: > - Akasha https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akasha > - Maven Artifact Resolver API ("mara" when used as package name or > artifactid > or in maven-mara-provider) > > > Does anybody have another idea? > Is there a preference in the community? > > Regards, > > Hervé > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
