Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/118
We cannot really marge the external provider to master if it is alpha or
beta version and if we do not have ITs.
We in hurry too much however we take full responsibility for the quality.
It's better to create a branch and update the branch. What we are missing
is documentation in Surefire on how the JUnit 5 is used in POM and test
coverage for the features matrix. This is what the users need to see. Once
we do it the users would like to try it and start reporting bugs against
us. Are you ready for handling responsibility for these bugs,
implementation and JUnit 5 altogether.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Benedikt Ritter <notificati...@github.com>
wrote:
> @Tibor17 <https://github.com/Tibor17> thank you for the input. I'd like
> to take have small PRs, so my proposal is to introduce this first PR and
> merge it to the code base after your comments have been resolved and then
> work incrementally on more tests which cover the different areas of
> configuration, etc. WDYT?
>
> â
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>
<https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/118#issuecomment-245377183>,
> or mute the thread
>
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA_yRzQexXIQAijPOLHh9NkShzd7Gxe9ks5qnwVfgaJpZM4J2QAo>
> .
>
--
Cheers
Tibor
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
