Am 2017-02-09 um 21:30 schrieb Benson Margulies:
How? When I declare a zip dependency on a non-reactor artifact, it is
just <type>zip</type>. Packaging doesn't show up in <dependencies>, or
is this what you are proposing?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-1683
The ZIP would have its own POM and lifecycle. Roughly, drastically
reduced JAR lifecycle.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote:
Am 2017-02-09 um 21:10 schrieb Benson Margulies:
-1 to zips on the classpath. We need to disentangle the java classpath
from the general concept of 'module X depends on module Y'. I created
quite a lot of code that uses zips as containers to pass files from
one place to another, and would be horribly broken if their transitive
dependencies started showing up.
This is because we finally need packaging zip. It would solve your problem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
