Let me kick off with my list:
What is working well:
1. It looks like we're going to have a new official Maven release soon.
2. Some take their responsibility to start a discussion. It is good to
rate the impact of changes if we want to stay one of the worlds standards.
3. We're all passionate, wanting to do the best.
What is not working well:
1. Reviewing commits has become too hard with all the "unnecessary"
commits pulled from master.
2. Not enough consensus, some discussions just keep on going without
ending, either by majority or a solution which works for all parties.
3. Number of (active) committers is too low for this huge project.
thanks,
Robert
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 22:56:14 +0100, Stephen Connolly
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
I think it is a good thing if we take stock of where we are and how we
are
doing. I would really appreciate if everyone could take a few minutes to
respond with their top three of two areas:
* What is working well
* What is not working well
I'll consolidate the responses after 72h and see if there are any themes
that can be identified
On the stuff that is not working well, I'll try and pick the three most
popular themes, we can then have a round of discussion on those three
themes to see if anyone has any ideas to improve those aspects of how we
work and hopefully we can have some votes to change things for the
better.
By the way, this is open to anyone in any way what so ever involved with
the Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1 effort (assuming you are paying attention to the
dev list ;-) )
Thanks in advance for your time,
-Stephen
P.S. As alpha-2 is near, I'll probably wait until after 3.5.0 before I
try
this again (assuming people like this idea)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
