Github user owenfarrell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/157
I don't think that logic would work for my scenario.
For example:
1. Create multi-module project with a test runner JAR (a la
`org.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-1383:1.0-SNAPSHOT`)
2. Recursively run the `install` goal over the multi-module project
3. Modify the test runner module
(`org.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-1383-runner:1.0-SNAPSHOT`)
4. Run the `test` goal over the multi-module project
According to your logic, Surefire would prefer the already-installed
artifact, effectively ignoring those changes made in step 3. That would put us
right back where we started.
Using my logic, Surefire would prefer the working copy changes and execute
accordingly. Since the existing `DependencyScanner` doesn't support classifiers
as written, I don't think my approach is introducing any new limitations there.
`DependencyScanner.java:114`
```
String[] groupArtifact = groups.split( ":" );
if ( groupArtifact.length != 2 )
{
throw new IllegalArgumentException(...);
}
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
