Should we see about moving our git-wip to gitbox? On Sun 22 Oct 2017 at 15:12, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote:
> now we have 15 git repos: 9 Git-WIP + 6 GitBox > I didn't try the git modules strategy to have an easy clone/pull: if > somebody > tried, please share results > > let's see the next candidates [1], which are less obvious than the 15 first > ones: > > - 2 sites (Maven and Doxia): anybody knows if CMS supports source in Git? > > - 2 parent poms: ASF and maven-parent. Seems feasible to have 2 repos. Only > issues I see are: > - how to name the repo for ASF? > - how to get the history for maven-parent, given there were a lots of > moves? > > - 6 resource bundles: http://maven.apache.org/apache-resource-bundles/ > what about doing 1 git repo only, with one unique common version? > > - 2 skins: seems feasible to have 2 repos (I don't know if getting history > is > easy or not) > > - 5 doxia tools: 5 repos seems reasonable > > - 41 plugins > - 26 shared components > really, this will be the hard parts... > > - archetypes: looks it has moved to 10 independant archetypes > > > The beginning of the list seems feasible: not as easy as previously, but > feasible > Are there volunteers to prepare reference target git repos? > > If we can't get the job done on these, I think that talking about plugins > +shared+archetypes is just a waste of time > > Regards, > > Hervé > > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Git+Migration > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Sent from my phone
