People who don't want to update are the ones who have to pay the effort, not the project that tries to ship a security fix. The simplest past forward is the one provided by Tony. Customers who don't want to use it can remain on previous version of the archetype plugins. Other proposals to fix it are just more time-consuming without providing value to Maven project.
- Re: proposal for maven-archetype to switch to d... Enrico Olivelli
- Re: proposal for maven-archetype to switch ... Enrico Olivelli
- Re: proposal for maven-archetype to switch to dom4j ... Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: proposal for maven-archetype to switch to d... Enrico Olivelli
- Re: proposal for maven-archetype to switch ... Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: proposal for maven-archetype to swi... Gary Gregory
- Re: proposal for maven-archetype to... Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: proposal for maven-archety... Tibor Digana
- Re: proposal for maven-arc... Homer, Tony
- Re: proposal for maven-arc... Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: proposal for maven-arc... Mickael Istria
- Re: proposal for maven-arc... Eric Lilja
- Re: proposal for maven-arc... Tibor Digana
- Re: proposal for maven-arc... Homer, Tony
- Re: proposal for maven-arc... Sylwester Lachiewicz
- Re: proposal for maven-arc... Tibor Digana
- Re: proposal for maven-arc... Enrico Olivelli
- Re: proposal for maven-arc... Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: proposal for maven-arc... Mickael Istria
- Re: proposal for maven-arc... Homer, Tony
- Re: proposal for maven-archety... Tamás Cservenák