Would it be possible to include all the jansi related issues ? That requires a release of maven-shared-utils MNG-7080, MNG-7079, MNG-6719, MNG-6239, MNG-6755, MNG-6380, MNG-6915 I'm willing to help, but all the PRs are kinda blocked because of the need for a maven-shared-utils release, so they include a snapshot dependency and obviously fail the tests...
Guillaume Le lun. 12 avr. 2021 à 09:06, Martin Kanters <martinkant...@apache.org> a écrit : > Great to see the enthusiasm. I also expected more work to be done for this > release, but apparently that's not the case (if we aren't missing something > else). > > As Romain is saying, I think we should put some work into documenting. At > least some of the new changes. Maarten Mulders and I are working on > documenting all reactor changes, listed under MNGSITE-444 [1]. Have we > documented other big features, like the Maven Wrapper and Build/Consumer > POM already? If not, should we make tickets for it? Also, not sure whether > this is required for alpha-1. > > Regarding MNG-6772 / MNG-6397 / MRESOLVER-168, I think we can either try to > include all in this release, or make that part of alpha-2. I'm unfamiliar > with the consequences, so I'll let you decide that ;) Let me know if I can > help. > > Regards, > Martin > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-444 > > Op zo 11 apr. 2021 om 20:07 schreef Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > +1, I just suspect we should be clear on the status of this alpha > (unstable > > and unexpected to hit CI for ex) and breaking changes which can break > again > > in final potentially (this is what generally upset people with alpha/beta > > and prevent their usage in later versions). In any case having some > preview > > is generally always worth it before ;). > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > Le dim. 11 avr. 2021 à 17:59, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> a > > écrit : > > > > > Attention: MNG-6772 is already on master and Robert and me have decided > > > to reopen it to give it more thought. It must be reverted from master > > > first before you cut a release until we have decided how to procede > with > > > this as well as related MNG-6397. > > > > > > Except that I see no reason not to continue with alpha-1. I am certain > > > that this is a good release, but we will require more rounds of it. > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > Am 2021-04-11 um 17:32 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: > > > > cutting 4.0.0-alpha release: very good idea!!! > > > > > > > > on the 3 issues, I can tell that MNG-6397 is a long standing issue > that > > > looks > > > > relevant (caused by MNG-6772 [1] that better describes it) > > > > > > > > But I don't see why this particular issue is an absolute must for > > > 4.0.0-alpha: > > > > I would propose to mark it for 4.0.x-candidate > > > > > > > > > > > > And I'm interested in people wanting to help on it (in a separate > > > thread). > > > > > > > > > > > > on the question of cutting the first alpha release, shouldn't we > > include > > > Maven > > > > Resolver 1.7.0? It would help to have MRESOLVER-168 to work on > > > MNG-6772... > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6772 > > > > > > > > Le dimanche 11 avril 2021, 16:19:49 CEST Martin Kanters a écrit : > > > >> Hi all, > > > >> > > > >> I am wondering if we have a good idea of what we want to have > finished > > > >> before cutting the first 4.0.0-alpha release. > > > >> I would love to work towards the actual release, and thus am > wondering > > > >> whether there's a list of issues we can finish. > > > >> When selecting all unresolved issues targeted for 4.0.0-alpha-1, > JIRA > > > comes > > > >> up with just 3 issues, which I'm not sure if they are still > relevant. > > > [1] > > > >> I guess there might be more we need to include in the version, but > > > that's > > > >> unknown to me. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Martin > > > >> > > > >> [1] > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-5&jql=project%20%3D%20MNG%20A > > > >> > > > > > > ND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.0.0-alpha-1% > > > >> 20order%20by%20priority%20DESC%2Cupdated%20DESC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet
