Hi,

Given that we had two releases with regressions I tend *not* to merge
#578. Give it more time and thought.

As written before on GH, not merging #578 or a backport of #476 will
bring back MNG-6843.
This will catch users off guard that were happily benefitting from
MNG-6843 being fixed in 3.8.2 and 3.8.3.

If you still want to do it this way, then please at least document that
MNG-6843 is back under "Known Issues" in 3.8.4 "Release Notes".
Additionally, MNG-6843 should be reopened.

I'd really prefer if we could keep MNG-6843 fixed, by whichever PR
(doesn't need to be mine).

Cheers,

Falko

Am 23.10.2021 um 21:22 schrieb Michael Osipov:
Folks,

all important tickets for Maven 3.8.4 have been addressed in
maven-3.8.x branch.

We have two open PRs:
* #578: Alternative to the ThreadLocal approach
* #476: As far as I understand a more global approach to the issue and
supersedes #576, but requires Java 8. So Maven 3.9+

Given that we had two releases with regressions I tend *not* to merge
#578. Give it more time and thought. Maybe go over to #476 directly in
3.9.0 and 4.0.0.

Please test and let me know whether you still see errors. If I don't
read any objections I will start the new release somewhere around mid
next week.

Michael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to