I don't understand what relation you are trying to establish between us and 
Spring Framework. Both are unrelated.

On 2023/06/08 10:59:09 Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> @Michael: point is that users will get java 21 anyway so can be a neat
> default. Guess our choice is either spring (17) or EE (21) today.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> 
> 
> Le jeu. 8 juin 2023 à 12:20, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> a écrit :
> 
> > On 2023/06/08 09:51:45 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> > > Hi to all,
> > >
> > > The most recent version of Tomcat 11.0.0-M7 has lifted it's JDK minimum
> > > to JDK21 !!!
> > >
> > >
> > https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-11.0-doc/changelog.html#Tomcat_11.0.0-M7_(markt)
> >
> > That's a fake argument. Not Tomcat requires it, but Jakarta EE 11 mandates
> > it. Tomcat then makes use of it.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to