FWIW, bazel changed its runtime requirement to Java 21. But they are shipping their own Java Runtime, so their users won't notice. [1]
I think they are the first build tool to do that. I say this as a FYI fact only, not implying anything. Make of it what you want. - Ben Am Di., 20. Feb. 2024 um 21:50 Uhr schrieb Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net>: > > Howdy, > > I intentionally used "Maven" here, and not "Maven 4" as I am sure the > majority of Maven users do not run Maven on the same Java version they > target with their build. We do not do that either. > > Some snippets from Herve (who is the ONLY one doing reproducible checks, > kudos for that) votes: > > Sun, Feb 18, 2024, 9:38 AM > [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.5.2 > Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 11 on *nix > > Wed, Jan 31, 2024, 5:06 AM > [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JLink Plugin version 3.2.0 > Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 21 and umask > 022 > > Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 8:29 AM > [VOTE] Release Maven Plugin Tools version 3.11.0 > Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with > umask > > Mon, Dec 18, 2023, 8:59 AM > [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin version 3.12.0 > Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 21 and umask > 022 > > Mon, Dec 18, 2023, 8:59 AM > [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin version 3.12.0 > Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 21 and umask > 022 > > Wed, Nov 29, 2023, 8:16 AM > [VOTE] Apache Maven Build Cache Extension 1.1.0 > Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 11 > > Sun, Nov 19, 2023, 5:17 PM > [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.17 > Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask > 022 > > Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 4:34 PM > VOTE] Apache Maven 4.0.0-alpha-8 release > Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask > 022 > > Mon, Oct 2, 2023, 9:11 AM > [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.5 > Reproducible not fully ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix and > umask 022 > > ==== > > This CLEARLY shows the tendency: > - Michael does releases on Java 8 (on windows!), he is a known "aligner" > and windows person :) > - Olivier used the "minimum" required Java version (for build cache). > - Unsure why Herve used Java 11 for the Shade plugin... I mean, he could > use 21 but also 8, but he shot for 11 that was EOL at the moment of release. > - The rest is 21. > > ==== > > So, the question for those refusing anything other than Java 8 to _run_ > Maven (or to revert: for those refusing to run Maven on "latest LTS", that > is currently 21): > WHY? > > > Thanks > T --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
