I added a piece of information: OpenJDK releases are currently pointed to the vendor's binary address. For example, OpenJDK17 Latest Release (https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/JDKUpdates/JDK+17u), it points to https://github.com/adoptium/temurin17-binaries/releases/tag/jdk-17.0.10%2B7
Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> 于2024年2月22日周四 07:08写道： > > Thanks for sharing! > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:23 PM Brian Fox <bri...@infinity.nu> wrote: > > > Hi everyone. I haven't caught up on this thread but Tamas pinged me to get > > some usage data from Central. Attached are the Maven versions and JDK > > Version counts as reported by User Agent by distinct IP for the last 30 > > days: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 4:15 PM Hunter C Payne > > <hunterpayne2...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > > > >> I also want to stress that we care about what maven supports far more > >> than what it requires to build. If it needs JDK 17 to build but the jars > >> are compliant with Java 8, that's fine with me. > >> > >> Hunter > >> > >> On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 at 12:47:33 PM PST, Romain > >> Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hmm, not sure im ready for a 200M vanilla build tool even if it would > >> have > >> been ok legally... > >> > >> Le mer. 21 févr. 2024 à 21:41, Hunter C Payne > >> <hunterpayne2...@yahoo.com.invalid> a écrit : > >> > >> > I might be wrong but I understood that shipping the JRE/JVM required a > >> > license and this is why most people don't ship with a JVM bundled. But > >> > perhaps that has changed since the Oracle v Google/Alphabet trial. > >> > Hunter > >> > > >> > On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 at 12:00:54 PM PST, Benjamin Marwell > >> < > >> > bmarw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > FWIW, bazel changed its runtime requirement to Java 21. > >> > But they are shipping their own Java Runtime, so their users won't > >> notice. > >> > [1] > >> > > >> > I think they are the first build tool to do that. > >> > > >> > I say this as a FYI fact only, not implying anything. > >> > Make of it what you want. > >> > > >> > - Ben > >> > > >> > Am Di., 20. Feb. 2024 um 21:50 Uhr schrieb Tamás Cservenák > >> > <ta...@cservenak.net>: > >> > > > >> > > Howdy, > >> > > > >> > > I intentionally used "Maven" here, and not "Maven 4" as I am sure the > >> > > majority of Maven users do not run Maven on the same Java version they > >> > > target with their build. We do not do that either. > >> > > > >> > > Some snippets from Herve (who is the ONLY one doing reproducible > >> checks, > >> > > kudos for that) votes: > >> > > > >> > > Sun, Feb 18, 2024, 9:38 AM > >> > > [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.5.2 > >> > > Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 11 on *nix > >> > > > >> > > Wed, Jan 31, 2024, 5:06 AM > >> > > [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JLink Plugin version 3.2.0 > >> > > Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 21 and > >> > umask > >> > > 022 > >> > > > >> > > Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 8:29 AM > >> > > [VOTE] Release Maven Plugin Tools version 3.11.0 > >> > > Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows > >> with > >> > > umask > >> > > > >> > > Mon, Dec 18, 2023, 8:59 AM > >> > > [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin version 3.12.0 > >> > > Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 21 and > >> > umask > >> > > 022 > >> > > > >> > > Mon, Dec 18, 2023, 8:59 AM > >> > > [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin version 3.12.0 > >> > > Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 21 and > >> > umask > >> > > 022 > >> > > > >> > > Wed, Nov 29, 2023, 8:16 AM > >> > > [VOTE] Apache Maven Build Cache Extension 1.1.0 > >> > > Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 11 > >> > > > >> > > Sun, Nov 19, 2023, 5:17 PM > >> > > [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.17 > >> > > Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with > >> > umask > >> > > 022 > >> > > > >> > > Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 4:34 PM > >> > > VOTE] Apache Maven 4.0.0-alpha-8 release > >> > > Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with > >> > umask > >> > > 022 > >> > > > >> > > Mon, Oct 2, 2023, 9:11 AM > >> > > [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.5 > >> > > Reproducible not fully ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix > >> and > >> > > umask 022 > >> > > > >> > > ==== > >> > > > >> > > This CLEARLY shows the tendency: > >> > > - Michael does releases on Java 8 (on windows!), he is a known > >> "aligner" > >> > > and windows person :) > >> > > - Olivier used the "minimum" required Java version (for build cache). > >> > > - Unsure why Herve used Java 11 for the Shade plugin... I mean, he > >> could > >> > > use 21 but also 8, but he shot for 11 that was EOL at the moment of > >> > release. > >> > > - The rest is 21. > >> > > > >> > > ==== > >> > > > >> > > So, the question for those refusing anything other than Java 8 to > >> _run_ > >> > > Maven (or to revert: for those refusing to run Maven on "latest LTS", > >> > that > >> > > is currently 21): > >> > > WHY? > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Thanks > >> > > T > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
