I also don't really see the value of having all SPI in a single repo. It seems easier to have each SPI inside the repository of each maven plugin instead.
Le lun. 6 mai 2024 à 14:25, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi Tamas, > > I kind of fail to see why org.apache.maven.maven-plugin-spi makes sense > instead of org.apache.maven.plugins.$pluginArtifact-spi ? > My understanding is that we already have that since any plugin can define a > specific SPI in its code and get it injected from a plugin dep using its > <configuration> block - exactly like shade plugin references its > transformers to be concrete. > So for me nothing to create nor modify to get an old feature. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le lun. 6 mai 2024 à 14:08, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> a écrit > : > > > Howdy, > > > > I'd like to create a new ASF Maven git repo "maven-plugin-spi". > > > > This repository would hold SPIs as explained here > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+Plugin+SPI > > > > Designated G: "org.apache.maven.maven-plugin-spi" > > > > For now, we have two candidates to apply SPI pattern: > > * maven-deploy-plugin (yet to be added) > > * maven-gpg-plugin (already have it, but in unusable form, as it does not > > follow pattern from wiki) > > > > Example GAs: > > org.apache.maven.maven-plugin-spi:maven-deploy-spi > > org.apache.maven.maven-plugin-spi:maven-gpg-spi > > > > Thanks > > T > > > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet
