Sure,

Again, I am fine with having SPI artifact next to plugin consumer artifact.
All I wanted to prevent is having tens or more versions of SPI artifact
released, while in fact they are "same thing".

T

On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 3:03 PM Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> wrote:

> Le lun. 6 mai 2024 à 14:38, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> a écrit
> :
>
> > lapsus: as in maven-core and maven-model SHOULD NOT share the same
> release
> > lifecycle. They DO currently.
> > Which implies that we have as many maven-model artifacts released so far
> as
> > many maven, but many of them are binary equivalent to each other.
> >
>
> What's the drawback with that ? It's much easier to handle for both the
> developper side
> and for the consumer side (they only have to upgrade a single version
> instead of two).
>
> I'm quite on the opposite side, and I'd much rather simplify our release
> cycles rather
> than going with one repo per jar...
>
>
> > That's all I wanted to prevent. Am fine with having SPI next to the
> plugin
> > as well...
> >
> > T
> >
> > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:36 PM Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Pretty much the same story as Maven models vs Maven "core" (maven-core
> in
> > > 3.x or api-imple in 4).... they don't share the same release lifecycle.
> > >
> > > SPI is not to be changed often, while we do patch releases of the
> > plugins.
> > > Am not saying we cannot keep SPI along with Plugins, I am just saying
> > that
> > > it's pointless: we will have many releases of the same thing.
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:31 PM Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Le lun. 6 mai 2024 à 14:29, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> a
> > >> écrit :
> > >>
> > >> > Howdy,
> > >> >
> > >> > IIUC you have a problem with designated G?
> > >> > As if so, that is really irrelevant. Point is that SPI cannot reside
> > >> with
> > >> > Plugin, as they share totally different release cycles.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Why ?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Second, you mention a plugin dep, that is hence available in the
> same
> > >> scope
> > >> > as the plugin itself...  which is obviously not enough in some
> cases.
> > >> >
> > >> > T
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:25 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi Tamas,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I kind of fail to see why org.apache.maven.maven-plugin-spi makes
> > >> sense
> > >> > > instead of org.apache.maven.plugins.$pluginArtifact-spi ?
> > >> > > My understanding is that we already have that since any plugin can
> > >> > define a
> > >> > > specific SPI in its code and get it injected from a plugin dep
> using
> > >> its
> > >> > > <configuration> block - exactly like shade plugin references its
> > >> > > transformers to be concrete.
> > >> > > So for me nothing to create nor modify to get an old feature.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > >> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > >> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > >> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > >> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > >> > > <
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Le lun. 6 mai 2024 à 14:08, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net>
> a
> > >> > écrit
> > >> > > :
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Howdy,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I'd like to create a new ASF Maven git repo "maven-plugin-spi".
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > This repository would hold SPIs as explained here
> > >> > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+Plugin+SPI
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Designated G: "org.apache.maven.maven-plugin-spi"
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > For now, we have two candidates to apply SPI pattern:
> > >> > > > * maven-deploy-plugin (yet to be added)
> > >> > > > * maven-gpg-plugin (already have it, but in unusable form, as it
> > >> does
> > >> > not
> > >> > > > follow pattern from wiki)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Example GAs:
> > >> > > > org.apache.maven.maven-plugin-spi:maven-deploy-spi
> > >> > > > org.apache.maven.maven-plugin-spi:maven-gpg-spi
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks
> > >> > > > T
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> ------------------------
> > >> Guillaume Nodet
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
>

Reply via email to