On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 23:23 +0200, Incze Lajos wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:03:12PM -0400, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> [...]
> > META-INF/maven/${groupId}-${artifactId}.pom
> [...]
> > META-INF/maven/${groupId}-${artifactId}.properties
>
> Why not ${groupId}/${artifactId}? The other scheme seems
> to be unresolvable if you don't have restrictions on the
> groupid/artifactid naming. (E.g. gid = a-b, aid = c; or
> gid = a; aid = b-c.)
I'd say this is improbable even with the conventions we use now, but
almost impossible given that we're moving toward FQDNs for the groupIds,
but better to be safe, you're right.
That being the case we just chatted in IRC and we'll do the path thing
as it lets us have two resources instead of three:
META-INF/maven/artifactId/groupId/pom.xml
and
META-INF/maven/artifactId/groupId/pom.properties
> incze
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jason at maven.org
http://maven.apache.org
In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
-- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
