> You didn't get my point. > > My point was that it is irrelevant if POMs in the repository are minimal or > not. > But it is extremely important that information which is the main maven > repository is _not changing_!!! >
I did get your overall point. But contrary to what you're now saying, you went on this tangent, which I was addressing specifically: "From this perspective it might be better to have a smaller but high quality repository which is growing then a big crappy repository containing invalid POMs or "naked" POMs like that (http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/axis/axis/1.2/axis-1.2.pom): project> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>axis</groupId> <artifactId>axis</artifactId> <version>1.2</version> </project> IMO at least project description and license should be present in all POMs in the repository. " So if you're now saying that minimal POMs are okay, then yeah, I agree. Kris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
