Jason van Zyl wrote: > People will always come and go but some people are willing to steward > a particular plugin. If there ends up not being those people then > that's fine. But I would hope some people care enough. They can always > work with the group of interested people and person who wants to > steward will most likely shift over time. If someone wants to take > charge and apply patches and do releases and assign themselves the > lead then they should go for it. I don't see it as an ownership thing, > I see it as a stewardship thing. I don't think its a "care" factor, its just that it goes off the radar. Especially when one steward gets 10+ plugins and has other things to do as it is.
I think regular reporting, giving anyone the opportunity to volunteer, is a better alternative here. > > Irrespective of that I agree that some form of review should be done. > All the information required for the view we should be able to glean > from the stock of information we have. Release dates can be picked off > (if not easily now, then we can make it easier using the repo > manager), issues closed for releases, stagnant issues or whatever else. +1 Cheers, Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
