2006/2/8, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Piéroni Raphaël wrote: > > 2006/2/8, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Piéroni Raphaël wrote: > >>> I don't know if it is the right tool. i jumped on Steve proposition as > i > >> was > >>> found of prolog during my school years. > >>> > >> I don't know if it is right either. One good reason for not using it, > >> but for sticking in java, is ease of integration with the existing > maven > >> codebase; nobody could add anything that depended on GPL code to the > >> repository, even LGPL is a bit sensitive. > > > > > > I do not understand this license issue. > > is it because Jlog is GPL that its artifact and pom are not in ibiblio ? > > no, it should be on ibiblio if it is popular. Lots of GPL things are > (like the mysql jdbc driver, bits of JBoss, etc) > > > is it because Jlog is GPL that we could not import class of jlog into > maven > > code ? > > yes
So we can't use Jlog i checked the amine-platform (another prolog) : it is LGPL. does LGPL also not usable in maven ? if yes, the prolog approach is not the correct one as i don't know any other open source prolog library. Regards, Raphaël
