after reading up on mocks from the links that vincent posted, I am going to take a stab at putting together a minor set of these to work with for a couple of the plugins...just to see how it would work out. Hopefully I can get with vincent a bit tomorrow to make sure I get it close to right the first time
jesse On 2/18/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Vincent Massol wrote: > > I think what you're describing is a stub but not a mock. The advantage > of a > > dynamic mock is that you don't need to code any method. It's the user of > the > > mock which says what behavior it should have for the methods it calls on > the > > mock. > > You're right, I've always referred to stubs incorrectly as mocks. I > meant a stub. I think it's in our interest to produce these to make > testing easier and more consistent for everyone. > > I'm interested to see your thoughts on the mocks eventually though - > I've never really done anything with them since I was reading JiA (which > I don't have any more :( > > - Brett > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- jesse mcconnell jesseDOTmcconnellATgmailDOTcom
