The test case attached doesn't work, there're missing dependencies
On 2/20/06, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I'm a little confused about how something is decided which
> release a fix goes into. Here's a good example: MNG-1898. This is
> functionality that was broken between 2.0 and 2.0.1. It is listed as a
> blocker and has reproducible test cases associated with it, yet this one
> didn't make the 2.0.3 release. The test case has been attached since
> just before 2.0.2 was released.
>
> Don't get me wrong, you guys have done geat work, but it's discouraging
> to see so many issues get bumped from revision to revision.
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
