Hi all
I've had a look at the docck plugin and I like what I see so far! A
couple of questions that popped up along the way:
There is a check to make sure there is an index.[apt|xml|...] file
present. Shouldn't a lengthy description in the pom be good enough?
If a parameter is missing a description, an error is reported stating
the mojo goal where the error occurred. As a developer I think it would
make more sense to report the class name, but that might not be available.
In the check for the scm tag, an error is reported if *all* children are
missing. Shouldn't that be if *any* of the children are missing?
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
