Regarding the scm tag, only warnings are produced from them, as what
brett stated in his doc standard email.
Brett Porter wrote:
On 27/06/2006 8:48 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi all
I've had a look at the docck plugin and I like what I see so far! A
couple of questions that popped up along the way:
There is a check to make sure there is an index.[apt|xml|...] file
present. Shouldn't a lengthy description in the pom be good enough?
Perhaps it should be a warning. Right now, I think it's valuable to
give extra direction beyond the description of the plugin on the front
page.
If a parameter is missing a description, an error is reported stating
the mojo goal where the error occurred. As a developer I think it
would make more sense to report the class name, but that might not be
available.
+1. or show both.
In the check for the scm tag, an error is reported if *all* children
are missing. Shouldn't that be if *any* of the children are missing?
I think connection is required, URL highly recommended, and the rest
are optional.
But I thought I struck this from the requirements (or made it
optional/configurable) since some plugins might not have a public SCM
at all?
Thanks for taking a look!
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
