I just wanted to point out that this effectively makes the testng support in surefire "broken" for a good number of users.
Anyone hoping to use testng tests with annotations at least... On 6/28/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nevermind....Fixed and attached patch. That wasn't hard at all! (grins imagining 20 other things potentially broken by simple patch.... ) On 6/28/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Before I go spinning my wheels in the surefire source too much I was > wondering if anyone here was more familiar than myself with the classloading > semantics involved with the surefire -plugin -> Surefire Booter execution? > > I've made comments on what I've discovered so far but if anyone has any > general guidance suggestions I'd appreciate it. I'm focusing in around the > SurefirePlugin classpath configuration of the booter right now as the source > of the problem but might be way off. Details are explained in the JIRA > issue. > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-134 > > -- > Jesse Kuhnert > Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer > > Open source based consulting work centered around > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. > -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
-- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
