I pasted the whole modello file here http://rafb.net/p/E4CXrv28.html
Regards,
Raphaël
2007/4/15, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry,
you can see in the sources
in the first comment of the archetype-descriptor-new.xml in
the archetypeng-archetype-descriptor project.
It has been commented in the "plugin proposition" mail thread.
I copy here:
<archetype id="archetype-artifact-id" partial="true|false" >
<requiredProperties>
<requiredProperty key="propKey" defaultValue="string to
replace" />
</requiredProperties>
<fileSets>
<fileSet filtered="true|false" packaged="true|false" />
<directory>src/main/java</directory>
<includes>
<include>**/*.java</include>
</includes>
<excludes>
<exclude>Main.java</exclude>
</excludes>
</fileSet>
</file-sets>
<modules>
<module id="module-artifact-id">
<fileSets/>
<modules/>
</module>
</modules>
</archetype>
2007/4/15, Franz Allan Valencia See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Btw, what is the proposed new descriptor format? :-)
>
> On 4/13/07, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/4/9, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > On 8 Apr 07, at 10:41 PM 8 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
> > >
> > > > It seems apparent now that we should push forward with the ng
> > > > stuff. I was going to test if it is at least equivalent to trunk
> > > > and then propose bringing it in to replace trunk and start to plan
> > > > out 1.0 from there.
> > > >
> > >
> > > It doesn't work the same yet, the mojos are just stubbed out and I
> > > have yet to get it to create an archetype though the tests are pretty
> > > good so far.
> >
> > Really please to ear ;)
> >
> > I will, starting from next week, refactor the descriptor as proposed.
> >
> > Raphaël
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > Does anyone have any bandwidth to help with that?
> > >
> > > I will walk through the code in its entirety but not until next week.
> > >
> > > Jason.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Brett
> > > >
> > > > On 09/04/2007, at 12:37 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 3/4/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> The Archetype plugin has lost the ability to "package" non-Java
> > > >>> resources. It looks like this happened with the addition of 'sub
> > > >>> packages' for Java sources.
> > > >>
> > > >> ping. Any thoughts on whether the problem with "packaging" resources
> > > >> should be fixed in the existing archetype code or whether
> > > >> maven-archetypeng will be ready soon?
> > > >>
> > > >> It's http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-65 .
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Wendy
> > > >>
> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
