Hi Brett,

On 06/06/07, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 06/06/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My recollection would be that some artifacts are filtered out but
> their transitive dependencies still needed to be taken into
> consideration for version calculations, so this could be the reason
> for this.

If an artifact is filtered out then why would it's transitive
dependencies impact upon the resolved artifacts?  The filtering
performed by DefaultArtifactCollector.filterTrail appears to snip the
branch at any filtered artifact.

Any insight into this?  I feel the artifacts should be filtered during
DefaultArtifactCollector.recurse.

Cheers,

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to