On 19/06/2007, at 2:35 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Sunday 17 June 2007 21:51, Brett Porter wrote:
On 18/06/2007, at 11:46 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Technically, if you follow all the latest legal discussions and
stuff, the name of the tgz/zip should be "apache-maven-2.0.7" which
would allow
to use an artifactId of apache-maven. We just changed over to
that format for CXF. That way the signatures are all OK as is.
(The directory it extracts to should also be apache-maven)
Do you have a pointer to the specific message-id or policy document
for this? I thought I followed that discussion and it was not seen as
a requirement.
I can't see why it would be legally required.
There are two "reasons" that come up with these discussions:
1) The project name is officially "Apache Maven", not "Maven". The
downloads and such should reflect that. (as should the READMEs,
the web
site, etc....)
Yes, I agree with that. Sorry, I thought you were suggesting it for
all artifact IDs, which would be a bit much.
I'm in favour of changing the distribution filename in future
releases (but don't see it as required for this one).
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
