On Monday 18 June 2007 12:41, Brett Porter wrote:
> On 19/06/2007, at 2:35 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > 1) The project name is officially "Apache Maven", not "Maven". The
> > downloads and such should reflect that. (as should the READMEs,
> > the web
> > site, etc....)
>
> Yes, I agree with that. Sorry, I thought you were suggesting it for
> all artifact IDs, which would be a bit much.
Oh. God no. Definitely a bit much. :-) There are a few people
that think every jar and pom and everything needs to
be "apache-foo.jar", but to me, that just makes classpath length issues
even more of an issue for no real benifit. Apache is in the groupId
already.
However, in CXF, we name the artifact that builds the distribution (we
don't do this from the top level pom due to some of the same issues
Wendy talked about) "apache-cxf" so the files the assembly creates
are "apache-cxf-${versions}.tar.gz" and they get properly GPG signed as
such. Basically, upon deploy, the org/apache/cxf/apache-cxf/VERSION
directory can just about be copied as is to the distribution download
area. No need to resign anything, rename anything, etc... For the
most part, I'm completely lazy. If I can have maven do the work for
me, great. :-)
> I'm in favour of changing the distribution filename in future
> releases (but don't see it as required for this one).
Agreed.
Dan
> - Brett
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
