On 11/09/2007, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do people feel about trying to use maven-artifact in 2.0.x? > > The code has not changed, and backward compatibility will be > maintained, and from Mark's trials it appears to work. Is this > correct Mark? The ITs run using the decoupled version?
I'm certainly in favour of giving this a go. I got the ITs running locally with ma3 in 2.0.x after fixing the plugin dependency problems that you described above. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]